Egyszerű keresés   |   Összetett keresés   |   Böngészés   |   Kosár   |   Súgó  


Részletek

A cikk állandó MOB linkje:
http://mob.gyemszi.hu/detailsperm.jsp?PERMID=151668
MOB:2021/4
Szerzők:Tolvaj Máté; Tokodi Márton; Lakatos Bálint Károly; Fábián Alexandra; Ujvári Adrienn; Bakija, Fjolla Zhubi; Ladányi Zsuzsanna; Tarcza Zsófia; Merkely Béla; Kovács Attila
Tárgyszavak:ECHOKARDIOGRÁFIA; SZÍVKAMRA; MORTALITÁS
Folyóirat:Imaging - 2021. 13. évf. 2. sz.
[https://akjournals.com/view/journals/1647/1647-overview.xml ]


  Added predictive value of right ventricular ejection fraction compared with conventional echocardiographic measurements in patients who underwent diverse cardiovascular procedures / Máté Tolvaj [et al.]
  Bibliogr.: p. 137. - Abstr. eng. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/1647.2021.00049
  In: Imaging. - ISSN eISSN 2732-0960. - 2021. 13. évf. 2. sz., p. 130-137. : ill.


Background and aim: Right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) assessed by 3D echocardiography is a powerful measure to detect RV dysfunction. However, its prognostic value in routine clinical practice has been scarcely explored. Accordingly, we aimed at investigating whether RVEF is associated with 2-year all-cause mortality in patients who underwent diverse cardiovascular procedures and to test whether RVEF can overcome conventional echocardiographic parameters in terms of outcome prediction. Patients and methods: One hundred and seventy-four patients were retrospectively identified who underwent clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiography comprising 3D acquisitions. The patient population consisted of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients (44%), heart transplanted patients (16%), and severe valvular heart disease patients (39%). Beyond conventional echocardiographic measurements, RVEF was quantified by 3D echocardiography. The primary endpoint of our study was all-cause mortality at two years. Results: Twenty-four patients (14%) met the primary endpoint. Patients with adverse outcomes had significantly lower RVEF (alive vs. dead; 48 +- 9 vs. 42 +- 9%, P < 0.01). However, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (21 +- 7 vs. 18 +- 4 mm), and RV systolic pressure (36 +- 15 vs. 39 +- 15 mmHg) were similar. By Cox analysis, RVEF was found to be associated with adverse outcomes (HR [95% CI]: 0.945 [0.908-0.984], P < 0.01). By receiver-operator characteristic analysis, RVEF exhibited the highest AUC value compared with the other RV functional measures (0.679; 95% CI: 0.566-0.791). Conclusions: Conventional echocardiographic measurements may be inadequate to support a granular risk stratification in patients who underwent different cardiac procedures. RVEF may be a robust clinical parameter, which is significantly associated with adverse outcomes.  Kulcsszavak: 3D echocardiography, right ventricle, ejection fraction, mortality